Aexus Answers

CI Speed Boost: Rebalance Test Matrix For Faster Runs

Alex Johnson
-
CI Speed Boost: Rebalance Test Matrix For Faster Runs

Hey there, fellow developers and tech enthusiasts! Ever felt like your Continuous Integration (CI) pipeline is moving at a snail's pace, holding up your brilliant ideas from reaching production faster? You're not alone! A slow CI can be a huge headache, eating into precious development time and delaying feedback. Today, we're diving deep into a fantastic example of CI optimization through integration test matrix rebalancing that dramatically reduced critical path execution time, making builds significantly faster and more efficient. We'll explore how a clever adjustment to how tests are grouped and run can lead to substantial time and cost savings. This isn't just about tweaking settings; it's about understanding the heart of your CI process and making it work smarter, not harder, for everyone on the team.

Why Your CI Needs a Speed Boost: Understanding the Bottleneck

Imagine this: you've just pushed your latest code changes, eager to see them pass through CI, but then you're hit with a long, agonizing wait. This waiting game is often caused by a CI bottleneck, a single point in your pipeline that significantly slows down the entire process. In our specific case, the main culprit was a massive integration test group humorously (or perhaps, frustratingly) called "CMD & Other Workflow Tests." This single group was a true behemoth, containing an incredible 6,719 tests and consuming approximately 85 seconds of execution time. To put that into perspective, it was running 4 to 18 times longer than any other test group in the entire integration matrix! This wasn't just a minor delay; it was a glaring bottleneck that held up the whole show, causing unnecessary downtime and frustration for developers. The impact of such a bottleneck goes beyond just wasted minutes; it affects developer productivity, delaying the crucial feedback needed to quickly identify and fix issues. When your CI takes too long, the cost of context switching increases, developers get distracted, and the overall pace of development slows down. Nobody wants to be stuck waiting for CI to finish, especially when it's just one oversized group causing all the trouble. Understanding and addressing these bottlenecks is the first critical step toward achieving a truly agile and efficient development workflow. By pinpointing the exact source of delay, we can apply targeted CI optimization strategies that deliver the most significant impact, transforming a sluggish pipeline into a lean, mean, code-shipping machine. The goal is to maximize parallelization, ensuring that no single test group becomes an unexpected critical path that dictates the total build time. We want to empower our teams with quick, reliable feedback, and that starts with a CI pipeline that keeps pace with innovation.

The Game-Changing Strategy: Integration Test Matrix Rebalancing

The brilliant solution to our CI woes was a straightforward yet incredibly effective strategy: integration test matrix rebalancing. Instead of letting one colossal group dominate the critical path, we decided to intelligently split it into smaller, more manageable, and much faster segments. This optimization focused on breaking down the monolithic "CMD & Other Workflow Tests" group, which was previously a catch-all for anything not explicitly matched by other patterns. This often happens when test suites grow organically, leading to unintended imbalances. The key was to introduce targeted patterns to create more focused and balanced test groups, thereby reducing the maximum group execution time by approximately 45%. This wasn't just about dividing; it was about strategically reorganizing to leverage the power of parallel execution offered by platforms like GitHub Actions.

Here’s a closer look at how we implemented this test suite optimization:

Before this change, the configuration looked something like this:

- name: "CMD & Other Workflow Tests"
  packages: "./pkg/workflow ./cmd/gh-aw"
  pattern: ""
  # Result: 6,719 tests, 85.2s execution time

As you can see, the pattern: "" meant it grabbed everything, leading to a massive group.

Now, after the rebalancing, we have these four distinct and focused groups:

  1. Workflow Cache & Actions: This group now specifically handles tests related to caching mechanisms and action-related functionality. Think about how your workflows interact with various actions or cache dependencies – these tests ensure that all works as expected. The pattern targets keywords like Cache, Action, and Container.
  2. Workflow Dependabot & Security: Dedicated to all things Dependabot and security-related. With the ever-growing importance of keeping dependencies secure, isolating these tests ensures swift feedback on potential vulnerabilities or breaking changes introduced by dependency updates. Keywords include Dependabot, Security, and PII.
  3. CMD Tests: This group is straightforward, encapsulating all tests originating from the cmd/gh-aw package. By giving CMD Tests its own dedicated slot, we ensure that the core command-line functionality is thoroughly and quickly tested without being bogged down by workflow-specific tests.
  4. Workflow Misc: This serves as our clever catch-all group, picking up any remaining workflow tests that don't fit into the more specific patterns above. While still a catch-all, its scope is significantly smaller now that the biggest chunks have been siphoned off, preventing it from becoming a new bottleneck. The pattern remains "" for packages: "./pkg/workflow".

These changes weren't just about aesthetics; they brought tangible benefits:

  • More Balanced Test Distribution: We achieved a much more even spread of tests across our CI matrix jobs, eliminating the single point of failure and delay.
  • Better Utilization of GitHub Actions Parallel Execution: With smaller, more focused groups, GitHub Actions could truly shine, running these tests concurrently and leveraging its parallel capabilities to the fullest.
  • Faster Feedback on PR Failures: When a specific test group fails, it's now much easier to pinpoint the exact area of failure (e.g., "Dependabot tests failed"), leading to quicker debugging and resolution.
  • Critical Path Significantly Reduced: Most importantly, the critical path — the longest sequential time any test group takes — dropped from a staggering 85 seconds to approximately 46 seconds. That's a huge win!

The rationale behind this approach is simple yet powerful: the original group, lacking any specific pattern filter, became a magnet for every test that didn't fit elsewhere, ballooning into an unmanageable size. By introducing focused patterns, we distributed the test load evenly, transforming a bottleneck into a series of parallel highways. This strategic CI optimization is expected to save ~40-50 seconds per CI run, a significant reduction of about 24% in the critical path. It's a testament to how intelligent restructuring can have a profound impact on overall efficiency and developer happiness.

Real-World Impact: Seeing the Savings in Action

This CI optimization isn't just theory; it translates directly into tangible benefits you can see and feel every single day. The expected impact from this rebalancing is quite remarkable, offering both immediate time savings and long-term cost reductions. Let's break down the numbers to truly appreciate the power of a well-optimized CI pipeline.

Time Savings: A Faster Journey to Done

Our analysis projects a substantial saving of ~40-50 seconds per CI run. This might not sound like much at first glance, but those seconds quickly add up, especially in a busy development environment.

  • Before the optimization: The integration critical path was a hefty 85.2 seconds, entirely dominated by the "CMD & Other Workflow Tests" group. When you combined this with other essential steps like linting (which took around 2 minutes), the total time from lint to integration completion was approximately 3.4 minutes.
  • After the optimization: We're looking at a vastly improved integration critical path of ~46.4 seconds. This new critical path is now held by a different group, "CLI Compile & Poutine," which remains the longest but is still nearly half the time of our old bottleneck. With the same 2 minutes for linting, the total time from lint to integration completion is now reduced to approximately 2.8 minutes.

This represents a net improvement of 40-50 seconds per run, making our CI process ~20% faster overall! Imagine shaving nearly a minute off every single CI run for every pull request, every merge, and every pipeline trigger. That's a significant boost to developer velocity and morale.

Cost Reduction: Saving Precious GitHub Actions Minutes

Beyond just time, these optimizations have a direct impact on operational costs. GitHub Actions, like many cloud services, charges based on usage. By reducing the critical path time, we effectively reduce the total compute time consumed by our CI workflows. Based on an average of 100 runs per month, this optimization is projected to result in a cost reduction of ~66-83 GitHub Actions minutes saved monthly. These savings can free up resources for other critical tasks or simply reduce the overall operational budget, proving that efficiency isn't just about speed, but also about smart resource management.

Analysis Data: The Proof is in the Numbers

Our conclusions aren't based on guesswork. This optimization was driven by rigorous analysis data, meticulously gathered from:

  • 100 recent CI workflow runs: Providing a robust statistical baseline.
  • Detailed test timing data: Specifically from runs #20198819554 and #20198757467, which highlighted the exact execution times of each integration test group.

The integration test group execution times before optimization clearly showed the problem:

  • CMD & Other Workflow Tests: 85.2s (6,719 tests) <— This was the glaring BOTTLENECK.
  • CLI Compile & Poutine: 46.4s (90 tests)
  • CLI MCP Other: 38.3s (56 tests)
  • Workflow Rendering & Bundling: 17.4s (817 tests)
  • Other groups: Ranged from a speedy 2.6s to 14.9s.

By targeting that 85.2-second bottleneck and distributing its load, we've transformed our CI, making it leaner, faster, and more cost-effective. This kind of data-driven CI optimization is crucial for maintaining high performance and efficiency in modern development pipelines.

Our Approach to Validation and Future-Proofing

Implementing significant changes to a CI pipeline, especially one as critical as the integration test matrix, requires a thorough and methodical testing plan and rigorous validation. We wanted to ensure that our CI optimization not only delivered the promised speed improvements but also maintained the integrity and reliability of our testing process. After all, a faster CI is only valuable if it still catches all the bugs!

Our initial testing plan included several crucial steps:

  • YAML Syntax Validation: We performed an initial check to ensure that all changes to the .github/workflows/ci.yml file adhered to correct YAML syntax. This is a foundational step, as even a minor syntax error can prevent the workflow from running altogether. This validation passed successfully.
  • Verified New Test Groups in Configuration: We meticulously checked that all the newly defined test groups (Workflow Cache & Actions, Workflow Dependabot & Security, CMD Tests, and Workflow Misc) were correctly present and configured within the CI workflow file. This ensured that our rebalancing strategy was accurately reflected in the pipeline's structure.
  • Confirmed Total Matrix Entries: A critical check was to confirm that the total number of integration matrix entries increased as expected. Prior to the change, we had 12 entries; after splitting the large group into four, we confirmed that we now have 15 total integration matrix entries. This confirmed the expansion and distribution of our test suite.
  • Monitoring First Run After Merge: A crucial post-merge step involves closely monitoring the first few CI runs to verify that the execution times align with our projections. This real-world data is essential for confirming the actual impact of the optimization.
  • Validate All Tests Still Execute: It's paramount to ensure that no tests were accidentally dropped or overlooked during the rebalancing process. We need to confirm that every single test that ran before the change still executes, just in a more efficient distribution. This guarantees no loss in test coverage.
  • Compare Timing Metrics Before/After: A comprehensive comparison of the overall CI timing metrics, both before and after the optimization, will be conducted to quantitatively confirm the improvements and validate our initial analysis.

Validation Results: Confidence Before Deployment

Even before merging these changes, we conducted rigorous pre-merge validations to minimize any potential risks:

  • YAML Syntax: Confirmed Valid.
  • Configuration Structure: Confirmed All 15 integration groups present and correctly defined.
  • Pattern Definitions: Verified that all new patterns were properly scoped to avoid overlap, preventing unintended test duplication or exclusion.

These validation steps provided strong confidence that the changes would achieve their intended effect without introducing new issues. The process was also greatly aided by the analysis generated by the CI Optimization Coach, an internal tool designed to identify and suggest such improvements, highlighting areas of inefficiency based on live CI data.

Future Optimization Opportunities: The Journey Continues

While this integration test matrix rebalancing brought significant gains, the path to perfect CI is an ongoing journey. We've already identified several additional optimization opportunities that could further enhance our CI performance, though they were not included in this initial rollout to minimize risk and focus on the biggest win first:

  1. Unit Test Optimization: We noticed two particularly slow unit tests that could benefit from dedicated attention:
    • TestProgressFlagSignature: This test alone takes a whopping 30.33 seconds. It's so slow, it might even be a mis-tagged integration test that should be handled differently.
    • TestCompileWorkflows_EmptyMarkdownFiles: This one clocks in at 15.94 seconds.
    • Addressing these two tests alone could potentially save an additional 30-40 seconds per run, demonstrating that even unit tests can become bottlenecks if left unoptimized.
  2. Timeout Tuning: Our current test timeouts are set quite conservatively. While this ensures stability, there is potential to tune these timeouts more precisely. By identifying appropriate, less conservative timeouts, we could potentially fail faster when tests hang, saving resources and providing quicker feedback for genuinely problematic tests.

These future considerations highlight that CI optimization is not a one-time fix but a continuous process of monitoring, analyzing, and refining. By systematically tackling bottlenecks, from the largest integration groups to individual slow unit tests, we can ensure our CI pipeline remains a lean, efficient, and reliable part of our development workflow. The ultimate goal is always a faster, more stable, and cost-effective CI, driven by data and a commitment to continuous improvement.

Wrapping Up: Embracing a Faster, More Efficient CI

And there you have it! We've journeyed through the intricacies of CI optimization, focusing on how integration test matrix rebalancing can revolutionize your development workflow. By strategically splitting a single, colossal test group, we've managed to slash critical path execution time, significantly reducing CI run times by 40-50 seconds per run. This translates to not just faster feedback for developers, but also tangible cost savings in GitHub Actions minutes—a true win-win!

This isn't just about technical tweaks; it's about fostering a culture of efficiency and continuous improvement. A faster CI means developers spend less time waiting and more time innovating. It means quicker iterations, fewer context switches, and ultimately, a happier, more productive team. Remember, a robust and speedy CI pipeline is the backbone of modern software development, empowering teams to deliver high-quality code with confidence and agility.

We encourage you to look at your own CI pipelines with a critical eye. Are there any bottlenecks lurking in your test matrices? Could a bit of rebalancing unlock similar gains for your team? The principles discussed here—identifying bottlenecks, leveraging parallelization, and systematically validating changes—are universally applicable. Embrace the journey of continuous CI optimization, and watch your development process transform!

For more insights into optimizing your CI/CD pipelines and leveraging the full power of GitHub Actions, check out these excellent resources:

You may also like